Last month Ingenue went to a play. Details de l’infamie.
This play is one that is difficult to categorise among a specific genre as it was a mixture of absurdisms and scenarios. Ultimately the viewer is left concluding that they had been invited into the mind of the creatrice and all her many millions of ponderings. In addition to that, the play took with it a series of passages from French literature: Jules Michelet, Les sorcières. Georges Didi Huberman, Mémorandum de la peste. Vincent Van Gogh, Lettres à Théo. Witold Gombrowicz, Ferdydurke. Fedor Dostoievski, Les Frères Karamazov.
There was no plot, no story line and no plausibility when trying to understand the performance. It was not so much in the vein of the surrealists, as it was more a survey of expressions and the experiences of situations living life.
Anis Gras is the small and tightly tucked away theatre in the suburbs of Paris, France. Le Lieu de L’autre, which roughly translates as The Space of the Other, is how the theatre space refers to itself. The space is reputed amongst the arts community of Paris as being particularly good for new theatre productions, seeing fresh minds and experiencing works of another kind. www.lelieudelautre.fr
Details de l’infamie, began with an introduction to 3 actors walking slowly and begrudged towards the foreground of the stage, dragging with them a table covered in props. The props of which there were many ranged from a wooden door, glass mirror, silver spoon, etc. to a few chairs and the table. Turning slightly on its front two legs, the trio tipped the table, from it slid the door neatly piled atop with the props. The door slide with an enormous thunder like sound to the floor. Retrieving the chairs the actors placed them around the oddly askew shaped table in the form of a semi-circle. The two male actors and one female actor then sat down and began with great intensity to look at the audience to intimidate them, or to persecute them for staring so admiringly at something they had no idea about? The intensity meant no-one could escape; the audience was incapable of hiding as the energy omitted by the gaze of the actors followed everyone around the room.
Ever so slightly the moment ceased with the female actor. With a slow and graceful glide she began moving towards her left, pushed by her front, her arms reached further and further until she was at a moment clasping her breast trying to hold back. In unison, the male actor to the left moved with and toward her. Slowly, the man in the centre of the stage intervened.
In silence, nothing was commented on, the gaze of intensity was broken by the fluidity of the actors dance.
Enveloped in one another, among themselves the silence broken once it became impossible to move. Onto the table and then to a stance, the actors burst into sudden laughter!
Format for the entirety of the play is best shown in this first scene. The way in which the actors go between self and audience; silence and enormous outbursts, sincerity and despondence, intrigue and isolation. There is no story line as such, but there is an exception with the continuity presented by the themes and the tone with which each of them is expressed. The audience was reminded at each interval that they are in a theatre space observing human behaviours. Continuously removed from their status as a passive spectator, the audience is reminded that they are among the same space as the actors – as well as, if not instead, they are of the same species and therefore the same experiences.
The female actor briefly displays a scenario of the “centre of attention”, the want to be and the want to have attention. Towards the end of the performance, after this display the shorter of the two men begins to run as a lunatic about the stage. He runs about screaming like a maniac “MOI MOI MOI MOI MOI MOI MOI MOI” referencing the need to be “centre of attention”. Screaming ” ME ME ME ME ME ME ME” (in translation), the man makes himself the centre of attention and as such draws the viewer away from the recent history of the play, to the present. The loudness and movement informed, shakes the audiences’ emotions to make sure of where we are.
Eventually the third of the actors, the tall bald-headed male goes right of stage to the entrance of the theatre space, the door opens to the fresh Parisian winter night’s air. There the space created by the actors is broken and forced to mix with that of the audience. Facing the audience the simple action of opening the stage door and signally the hot air to escape the space, before speaking “il fait chaud ici, oufh!” roughly translates “wow, it’s hot in here isn’t it!”. The audience becomes once again apart of the space, and the division between performance and spectators no longer exists.
As a theatre production, Détails de l’infamie presented itself as intriguing. In terms of the visual arts concept, the space resembled a performative work as well as an installation space. Layering was a common theme throughout that made the play conscious of different aspects of the space; sound, music, lights, mirrors, objects and the performers. It’s possible to imagine the stage as a gallery space exhibiting the works of several artists.
For more information about the theatre, or the play go to the website of the Anis Gras www.lelieudelautre.fr